Anyway, I digress; People were saying that categorizing is inherently bad and it only excludes people, but categories are necessary for human interaction (this is in direct relation to schemas if you've ever taken a psych class). The world is too big for us to understand it in its small parts so we put things together and understand them as groups. So I came up with the theory that the categories aren't the problem, its the definitions of the category. If you define your categories using stereotypes and assumptions, your view of the group becomes very limited. If you define your categories with facts then you can add all of the individual characteristics of a person in order to define them by their terms, and understand them better.Now that brings up the question of what are the facts that should be used to define your categories? What facts are there about race? Because race isn't a biological thing, there are very little facts. So I'll break it down..
